Nuclear power is the only realistic way to reduce carbon dioxide emissions

WebElements's picture
I agree
39% (147 votes)
Definitely not
45% (169 votes)
Not sure
16% (59 votes)
Total votes: 375

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Perhaps our time would be

Perhaps our time would be better spent dealing with the waste products , ( other than putting them in a can and burying it in the ground) , rather than increasing production only to create a nuclear crock-pot for our children to sup on in the future.

Too bad you are basing your

Too bad you are basing your opinion on false assumptions. With proper reclamation systems (see France) the amount of waste that has to be dealt with through sequestration is minimal; less than a dump truck load per year.

Yes, I do have a degree in this area.

Real Estate India Real

Real Estate India
Real Estate Properties India: Buy commercial property, Residential property in India. Commercial & Residential properties, Flats & Apartments, Houses for sell in India.

Online Real Estate Video
Watch, Publish & Post Real Estate Properties Video Online: atoneplace.tv is the best source for Online Real Estate Video, Properties Video Clips, Real Estate Online Video. Post Real Estate Video Clips at no cost.

I totally agree with you.

I totally agree with you. Actually, we are spoiling our children's future.
wellsfargo mortgage

Greatest source of energy is

Greatest source of energy is solar energy and we have the resources an the machinations to use it in place of fossal fuels.The problem is not the lack of safe energy but greed on the part of oil companies and the politicians who support their agender.

Sure oil companies are

Sure oil companies are greedy. EVERY corporation is greedy. That is by design and it is not a bad thing. The greed needs to be balanced by regulation and transparency (and, of course, an actively inquisitive public.)

However, the oil companies stay in business through the GREED of the individual. A greed for more and more enegery and lowest possible cost. So given the choice of a barrel full of liquid fossils (low capital expenditure) and lots of shade (high capital expenditure) the consumer is the source of the GREED that leaves us where we are.

Nuclear is another great option that irrational people are afraid of. This same group of know-nothings lobbies and spreads the unfounded fear to ensure that the US will never have the nuclear power capabilities that France has.

you might finish using

you might finish using nuclear energy!

ristcason's picture

were did you get this

were did you get this piture. it looks like it is off of a aname tv show. im not saying this to be mean but it dosnt look like any one here drew it. anyway it looks cool you should go to photobucket.com it has a bunch of pitures it has almost a piture of evrything.

anyway nuclear energy is

anyway nuclear energy is limited because the thing use to create it is uranium and uranium is limited

no way. Plutonium and

no way. Plutonium and Neptunium can be used too. Plutionium-239 and Neptunium-239 would work for the fission process.